In June 2021, decades of debate regarding the ability of collegiate athletes to profit off their name, image, and likeness seemingly came to an end with the U.S.
Any Federal Solution Must, at Minimum, Level the Playing Field Across Different States Student-Athletes Have Also Demonstrated Support for Federal NIL Legislation Federal NIL Legislation Has Been Teed Up in Congress-But Legislators Have Yet to Take a Swing The NCAA Punted the Ball to Its Member Divisions Federal Legislation Is Needed to Wrangle NIL Regulations into Something Workable The NCAA’s Restriction on Noneducation-Related Benefits May Violate Antitrust Laws Student-Athletes Could Potentially Qualify as “Employees” Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Alston on the Possibility of Student Athletes Being Paid to Play The Lack of Uniform NIL Regulations in Addition to the Transfer Portal Has Transformed the Transfer Process into Free Agency NIL Deals Are a Gamble-But Boosters Indicate That They Are a Gamble Worth Taking Sample NIL Deals and Implications for the Future of College Athletics Schools in States Without NIL Legislation Twenty-Nine States Have NIL Legislation Currently in Place
0 kommentar(er)
